1. (Biological TheoriesActions) What is the most convincing argument in the firs

1. (Biological TheoriesActions) What is the most convincing argument in the first article? Explain why you think this is so convincing.2. (Biological TheoriesActions) The second reading in this document is an argument against biological readings like the one before it. What is the most convincing argument in this second article? Explain why you think this is so convincing. Trigger Warning: Some of you might find things discussed in these next two articles as difficult to digest, especially if you are trans and/or non-binary. Please take care while reading them. This class focuses on the trans inclusive perspective, but I’ve assigned the other perspective to help us talk about how to engage with those who have different viewpoints (if we want to).3. (Conservative Perspective (Links to an external site.) & Trans Response (Links to an external site.)) These two articles are in dialogue with one another. What is the biological argument they disagree on?4. (Conservative Perspective (Links to an external site.) & Trans Response (Links to an external site.)) Of the two, do you think Williamson or Keenan is more persuasive? Why?5. (Conservative Perspective (Links to an external site.) & Trans Response (Links to an external site.)) If given the opportunity, would you choose to engage with this conservative argument? Why or why not?
Requirements: answer every question in detail

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.